Ottawa (July 30 2015) –
Released by the science group Evidence for Democracy, the website provides an interactive platform to show the consequences that the erosion of public-interest science is having on Canadians and their environment.
The website launches in the wake of widespread criticism against the federal government by the science community over increasingly restrictive communication policies for government scientists, growing concerns over cuts to crucial government research and monitoring programs, and reduced funding for basic scientific research.
Through a series of case stories, the True North Smart and Free website documents over seven years of federal science policies and decisions. From the closure of research libraries to Canadian Ice Service scientists not being able to tell Canadians that arctic ice was at the lowest level ever, the website demonstrates the importance of science in evidence-based government decision-making.
Evidence for Democracy has released the tool in the run up to the election to help raise awareness about the role of public-interest science and informed decision-making in a healthy democracy to help make science and evidence-based decision-making an election issue this fall.
“Canada’s traditional investments in public science and our commitment to informed, rational decision-making has helped to make us one of the safest, healthiest and best educated countries in the world,” said Dr. Katie Gibbs, Executive Director of Evidence for Democracy. “Unfortunately, recent decisions that erode public-interest science are putting this progress at risk.
“The economy, social programs, and public safety are issues that typically take the spotlight during elections. But without good supporting science, government decisions on these issues are merely guesswork – and often not very good guesswork at that,” said Dr. Scott Findlay, Associate Professor of Biology, University of Ottawa and Evidence for Democracy Board Member. “For what might be the first time in Canadian history, the federal government’s public science performance is an election issue.”